The High Court has refused permission to appeal in a dispiriting boundary and right-of-way dispute, emphasising that minor encroachments on an easement may not constitute a substantial interference

The High Court has refused permission to appeal in a dispiriting boundary and right-of-way dispute, emphasising that minor encroachments on an easement may not constitute a substantial interference
The Supreme Court decision represents a significant recalibration of risk in non-commercial joint property finance.
Background:
Mrs. Catherine Waller-Edwards, who was financially independent and
This High Court case serves as a powerful cautionary tale against opportunistic buying from vulnerable sellers and emphasises the absolute necessity of strict legal compliance and transparent conduct
The High Court considered the application of anti-avoidance principles to established practices in non-domestic rating (NDR), specifically addressing the "box scheme" approach to vacant
The Court of Appeal (CoA) confirmed that even a significant divergence in valuation does not automatically equate to a finding of negligence.
Background:
Mr. Bratt owned a site in Oxfordshire which
The High Court recently considered the nuanced requirements for establishing actual occupation as an overriding interest capable of taking priority over a mortgage.
Background:
Mrs. Hevedi has been
The High Court has recently delivered a stark warning to property developers and landowners about the importance of clearly defined and achievable obligations when it comes to the adoption of estate
The High Court looked at a case where an unauthorised person entered into a regulated sale and rent-back agreement (SARBA) and whether the successor in title was bound.
Background:
Mr. and Mrs.
The High Court heard an appeal against a court order that dismissed a claim against the appellant’s mother and half-brother.
Background:
David Jones, the appellant, claimed that he was entitled to
The Court of Appeal (CoA) was faced with the question of whether a boundary agreement binds successors in title and, if so, only if they have knowledge of the agreement.
Background:
Mr. White and